Following their … Still, both mics have a metallic design that is ultra-rugged and strong, able to withstand and endure through heavy-duty usage. You need an account to post a reply. Neumann’s microphones are recognized for their rich sound, extraordinary detail, and fantastic depth. There are differences in design; The U47 is more circular and tubular, while Neumann U87 is edgier, with the grille shape being, to some extent, rectangular. I insisted on the U47, but he was dead set on the 67. Maybe the large ones are easier to make. Yes, there is no direct comparison between the 2 that I know. Sorry for any unitended slings or arrows. The Neumann U87 can be an ideal choice. On the other hand, Neumann U87 has a slightly higher maximum SPL handling, which is 117 dB. Strangely enough, Neumann U47 highlights a single polar pattern that is cardioid whereas the Neumann U87 is designed with three selectable directional models. I really cant explain it and other people I have talked to heard the same thing and they werent able to explain it either. It wasn't aimed at you or anyone else in particular. Neumann U47 vs. U87 Design. I could be way off base. As he was looking thru my mic closet, he saw the TLM 67, and asked what this was. Condenser mics are usually used in studios to capture sounds with exceptional detail and precision. Too adaptable, it sounds astounding on any source. Peace. I have searched myself. Is it Ok to Leave a Microphone in the Shock Mount. I'd assert anything in the TLM range is, well, mediocre, at best. A cardioid polar model gets sounds from the front while excusing sounds starting from the sides and back. Both the Neumann U47 and U87 are condenser microphones. That is useful when you need to manage loud volume levels. Required fields are marked *. I don't know. Therefore I made a small comment about the TLM 170 not being really a LDC. The U87 may be used incredibly near a sound source without experiencing any audio interference. Generally, the Neumann U87 has a comparatively better performance and output quality in comparison to the Neumann U47. If it did, it wouldnt be $1800 street value. In my opinion, it's one of the best LDC mics on the planet and belongs in any serious recordist's kit. With the pre-attenuation pad turned on, it increases to 127 … Your email address will not be published. Neumann U87 is capable of capturing beautiful sounds due to its higher sensitivity levels. At a glance, Neumann U47 and Neumann U87 may appear to be somehow similar to one another. In contrast with all other polar examples, the U87 has the least bass reaction, and it is susceptible to wind and an ideal choice for managing disturbance. Often I reject positive prejudices of colleagues towards LDCs, like sounding 'fuller' or giving more bass response, etc. Neumann U87 vs AKG C414 | Female Vocal Comparison - YouTube It was a U67, which I had never really heard before. Is this just because you like the colouration that a transformer gives to the sound? A mics’ polar pattern is a significant factor for understanding if a microphone is a right device for a specific circumstance. it seriously is. Maximum SPL Handling The next difference between Neumann U67 and Neumann U87 is the maximum SPL handling. I don't think the terms LDC and SDC even entered the lexicon until sometime in the 90s. So I set it up and to me it sounded a little bit more present than my u87. And how so compared to a u87 or 67. It seems as though a lot people think large diaphragms = large sound, small diaphragms = small sound. The U87 is most likely the best sounding all-around studio workhorse mic ever manufactured. Mics aren't loudspeakers, and aside from lower self noise and increased directionality at high frequencies, most differences between mics can't be explained merely by comparing the diaphragm size. Both the Neumann u87 and Neumann TLM 103 were ran through the @Universal Audio Arrow, using the Neve 1084 unison preamp. Am Curtis and I spend most of my time with microphones. It is a decent selection for various general-purpose applications such as studio recordings, broadcasting, film, and Television. The Neumann U47 and U87 produce high quality sounds.These microphones are hand-made in Germany by highly trained specialists, and customers all around the world can have certainty that these mics can capture sound superbly. The U87 is a three polar-pattern, large-diaphragm condenser with -10db pad and a low frequency roll-off switch to minimize proximity effect.A descendant of the famed U67, the U87 has been the vocal … Just lay it out. Neumann U47 has a frequency response range of 40 Hz – 16 kHz, and 8 mV/Pa sensitivity at 1 kHz into 1 k-ohm load. Click here to login, The ability to reply to and create new discussions, Access to members-only giveaways & competitions, Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As, Access to members-only sub forum discussions, Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio, Promote your eBay auctions and listings for free. It has the most elevated side dismissal compared to any other polar model making it extremely helpful to manage signals entering the receiver originating from the side. The TLM170 is a "MDC". get the tlm from a dealer to try out and compare yourself. In contrast, Neumann U87 has a frequency reaction range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz. Microphones have progressively improved from a primary receiver to an advanced condenser microphone that provides you with the sweet, smooth sound that you prefer. Over the years, it has accomplished practically renowned status as one of the leading microphone makers all over the world. ah random U67 mp3...another random TLM67 mp3...all from the interwebs??? With numerous polar patterns, the U87 microphone provides a lot of flexibility, permitting you to deal with any condition effortlessly. Would you say Tlm 67 has a specialty to it, the way it captures vocals? It portrays how an amplifier is sensitive to sound waves from various directions. Both Neumann U47 and Neumann U87 are using the pressure gradient transducer as the working principle. The other weekend I had a friend come over and track some vocals. Depending on your needs, the above review will help you make your final decision. That implies that you can record sounds that have better clarity. After telling him about the mic, he said lets put it up. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. It wasnt a negative asthetic sound that it has and it actually sounded kind of cool but honestly I didnt think it was convincing enough to keep and I sold it. Neumann U67 has a lower maximum SPL handling, which is 116 dB. The other weekend I had a friend come over and track some vocals. Are you now wondering whether you should go for Neumann U47 or Neumann U87? On the other hand, the Neumann U47 has an incredibly high SPL handling. A switch is found underneath the head grille where you can choose any of the three directional patterns, these are: The term polar pattern depicts how a microphone captures sound. All in all, the U67 was a dramatic step forward in microphone technology and design for the new decade of the 1960s. This polar model is particularly valuable if you have to focus the sound record from one source or direction, for instance, for musical purposes. Additionally, participates in various other affiliate programs, and we sometimes get a commission through purchases made through our links. My rant was against those who assume certain microphone characteristics based on the size of a diaphragm. Moreover, the noise level of this mic is shallow. everything else is complete nonsense. Note: This article is a segment of a multi-part series detailing the history and technology behind some of the industry's most beloved and … It was a U67, which I had never really heard before. So basically I would say, not being your recipient, I agree with what you wrote.,, DPA Microphones :: Large vs. Small Diaphragms in Omnidirectional Microphones,, Introducing the fabolous TLM67/U87 to U67 mod, Already have an account? I have had the TLM 67 for about a year and a half. There are differences in design; The U47 is more circular and tubular, while Neumann U87 is edgier, with the grille shape being, to some extent, rectangular. IMO, and take that for what it is worth, it wont have the U67 sound you are looking for (unless you never heard a real U67). Are you looking for a vocal microphone for a commercial facility? I don't know. In fact I had the impression something special is associated with a LDC in the TLM 170 praises. As the name suggests, this bidirectional polar model captures sound from two “circles” of sensitivity coming from the front and back. In the end we both liked the TLM67 better for his voice. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. He knew about my extensive mic aray (U47, 800G, Rode Tube Classic, U87, C12, M149), but brought a mic he just got off Ebay.